Відео

Risk of death increases with age.

I am using W3W to tell people the location of trees. Readings on my phone tell me the GPS inaccuracy. This can be 10s of meters. If the tree is in a street I use the initial reading to go to the web site and use the street view to more accurately pinpoint the centre of the tree. If the tree is in a wood I can't pick out a particular tree from the large green area so the W3W is less useful, but it is still useful. Obviously any system will be limited by GPS accuaracy.

This Steele guy reminds me of the political libertarian guy Steele who also explores random topics in interview form

An interesting connection to taurine is that the blue zones studies found every group to eat a high amount of beans. Beans are high in taurine. Although seaweed is higher and easier to supplement with. Unfortunately the studies author keeps saying it’s just a plant based diet which doesn’t track otherwise vegetarians would have a solid track record of long life.

,🇵🇬🇵🇬

🇵🇬,.,.

What about putting lime in Corona beer ?

Just worry about working on your cardio. You can easily take your heartrate yourself. I have a Garmin dive watch and its very inaccurate. Tattoos, sweat, hair and placement all contribute.

54 years old , Resting heart rate mine 49 ,correlated VO2 , good to know this , my cac score is 600 , even I think I have a strong heart rate. I should lower my statin mg

Yes

Why are his eye brows smiling so much lol

What about taking your watch off before bed?

Fully tested with my wordle ai (crane)

Excellent demonstration, loved the overall quality of the content. Enjoyed very much

we have a post code so don't need this three word thingy

Sleeping is quite literally resting...

Another complication to consider is software updates, if you try to monitor your RHR over time is the change you observe merely due to modified algorithms. 🤔

Moustache is very distracting from the good information he's sharing. Also could the guys have any smaller, shittier chairs? 🤔

You can trust in almost everything because modern smart watches are accurate but only except blood pressure. It's useless and of course not accurate and you completely should ignore it.

All I can say is that my Apple Watch has potentially saved my life- twice. It’s informed me about severe AF that I suffer from, twice. As for steps: my wife has a Fitbit, (which she hates) and when we walk the distance and steps are incredibly accurate between my Apple Watch and her FitBit. She’s had three fitbits, first two failed during warranty- absolutely appalling reliability. She now wants an Apple Watch, only disadvantage being reduced battery life. When her FitBit inevitably dies again, that’s what we will get.

My smartwatch told me my RHR was as low at 36BPM. luckily, it was correct and warned me appropriately after the doctor did a 24 HR ECG and found a heart issue.

Mine seems reasonably accurate. Had a hernia Op 7 weeks ago. They hooked me up to all the machines and suddenly alarms started going off. My heart rate was showing 43, about right for what my watch shows. Although it leapt to almost 50 when all the alarms started going off, until they explained why. Once I told them I was an ultra runner they were fine.

The Federal government has no incentive to increase fund research into extending life span. The treatments sound too expensive for an already over-extended Medicare and even now life spans may be too long be able to support Social Security for the existing, increasing elderly population. There may not be an active conspiracy around this, but it's certainly in the backs of some policy maker's minds.

it's misleading to say the oura ring is lying in this context. it's marketed a sleep wearable.

Hats off to the skeleton with a pelvis instead of a skull.

I only wear my watch during the day and the resting heart rate is still in the 40s, according to the Garmin watch.

You can check your resting heart rate during the day by stopping for a bit and checking. You can’t check your watch during the night, or during your absolute resting heart rate, so that’s why you should get that reading.

wait lmao you people wear these when you sleep too jfc get therapy

Statins 👎👎👎👎👎

Lmao I RAAANNN to the comments

Wearables are never going to be as good as a proper GE/Dynascope/etc machine you'll find in a hospital but for making you aware that your HR is high, your ECG is off etc and you need to seek medical help they've proven to be quite useful in that regard

🇵🇬🇵🇬.,,.

*breathes in audibly*

Nice to know. Oldie days measured by feel. 15 seconds try a few times see if consistent count. Not convenient but can reasonableness check HRM. Chest straps tend to be more accurate.

Me with my apple watch RHR reading of 92: 🥲💀

Someone didn’t turn on his sleep focus mode on the Apple Watch. If you do that, the Apple Watch won’t take into account the sleeping heart rate for the calculation of the resting heart rate.

My Apple Watch is reporting a resting heart rate that is actually pretty close to what it is measuring during the day, while I am sitting at my desk, though it doesn't actually differ significantly from my sleeping heart rate (maybe 5bpm difference)

My apple watch was warning me about low heart rate while I'm asleep. I was pretty concerned and consult with my doctor, did some measurements, wore a cardiologist device measuring me for 3 days while logging everything what happens to me. Everything was fine. Later it showed around 40 beats during the day, while I was actively talking and obviously didn't have that low numbers. I'm happy for people who got important warning in time, but for me it gave only anxiety 😢

This is the complete wrong way to look at any of this data. These sensors are all pretty basic, on every watch. So are they inaccurate? Yes. But you made an entire video on it, which tells me you and others _miss the entire point_ The point is looking at the _trends_ over time. Did my RHR go down? Up? Did changes I make to my lifestyle like more sleep or exercise change my RHR? That's how you're supposed to measure and use the data. You'll need much better equipment for an accurate reading. But that ISNT necessary for trending data. All you need is a starting point and then data over time to look at changes _over time_ . If it's off by 5 or 10% doesn't matter for 90% of the analytics we would need from one of these watches.

Take phone, Place over heart, record audio for 20sec, trim video to 20sec exact, count beats, multiply by 3, bpm calculated, mine was 57

Imagine just having a normal conversation while sporting that mustache, as though you're just a real person.

Lmao mine is a resting of 78 💀

I think your watches are broken. I had a few (Sony,noname,Xiaomi) , and they all indicated my correct RHR (range between 90-105) . This was also confirmed by a scale.

The whole video looks weirdly sped up. Looks so unnatural. Maybe practice delivering the lines faster so you don’t have to speed up the video as much.

I wear oura and my resting heartrate is 68....am I gonna die? 😂

My FitBit and Apple Watch returned similar resting heart rate measurements. A fun observation of my own health is that my resting heart rate is higher when I’m sleep deprived.

Just like a power meter on a bicycle. Your data is only comparable to your own equipment no on else's. You can see overall trends. If you have a same device for 3-5 years it far more useful to look at trends you and device has. These companies have a disclaimer, these are not medical devices. If you suspect you have a health issue you seek out a doctor.

There are some studies in males showing that a lot of the age associated loss of VO2 Max is not wholly inevitable and can be mitagated by serious exercise. I'm a little uncomfortable about how you discussed that part but I enjoyed the video.

People want to obsess over these things but dividing things up by quartiles or quintiles, of any of these metrics, is about the highest level of exactitude you can really expect or put some stock in. I've read that resting heart rate can be genetically low or high but a change toward lower can be an indicator of fitness. Drastic changes should be run by a doctor though as it can go down or up for non-fitness related reasons. Comparisons between individuals may not work even though people want to do that so bad! It may be an internally consistent metric though. So many want it to be an externally consistent metric. It isn't at this level of testing/measuring. This is a lot like bodyfat testing. You might actually have a 3% drop but you might not really know your actual bodyfat percentage with the same accuracy as your estimation of drop. It's still useful to compare yourself to yourself but less good to compare yourself to others which is what so many want. I'm suggesting that might be something to deemphasize and for more than one reason.

If my RHR was 35-48 even while awake I'd probably think "hey, that's neat" while also making a doctor's appointment